

Checklist


Traditional IAM platforms:
Legacy IAM tools like identity governance and administration (IGA) and privileged access management (PAM) were built for structured, static environments—not the modern identity landscape. While they handle provisioning and governance, they often lack real-time behavioral insight, take years to implement, and require heavy customization. Many never deliver the time-to-value or ROI organizations expect.
Security-first platforms:
Those solutions that originate from endpoint, network, or cloud protection frameworks—even those that have added identity signal enrichment—still tend to treat identity as one data point among many, not as the central control plane. While these tools can detect behavioral anomalies and offer some enforcement, they often lack deep visibility into identity entitlements, access paths, and privilege misuse. As a result, they miss the full context of who accessed what, why, and how—a critical blind spot in identity-driven attacks.
Point solutions:
Targeting individual identity challenges—like access reviews, CIEM, or NHI monitoring—often adds operational overhead. Each brings its own dashboard, logic, and data model, increasing complexity instead of reducing it.
Most organizations operate with a hybrid, fragmented IAM infrastructure—spanning Active Directory, cloud identity providers, SaaS, legacy systems, and distributed environments. This complexity makes it nearly impossible to enforce consistent policies, maintain visibility, or respond to risk in real time. Identity security controls end up siloed, reactive, and riddled with blind spots.
With hundreds of identity security solutions on the market—each claiming to solve a piece of the puzzle—it’s critical to know what capabilities truly matter. Whether you're evaluating platforms for MFA, identity threat detection and response (ITDR), privileged access, identity security posture management (ISPM), or non-human identity (NHI) protection, understanding what to look for in each area will help you identify the product that meets your organization’s unique needs.
This RFP checklist is designed to help you evaluate vendors across six key product areas and ask the right questions to find a comprehensive, best-of-breed solution that fits your environment—and future-proofs your security.
To truly reduce risk and strengthen identity defense, organizations need a unified identity security platform—one that brings together complete visibility, real-time threat detection, access insights, posture management, and policy enforcement across all identities, human and non-human, cloud and on-prem. A holistic approach to identity security enables security and identity teams to make risk-aware, context-driven security decisions in real-time to boost security and improve compliance performance overall.
Lack of Visibility Across IAM Infrastructure and Resources: Organizations often lack a unified view into identities, their privileges, entitlements, and access activity. This allows misconfigurations, vulnerable protocols, legacy trust relationships, and unmanaged accounts to frequently go undetected.
Silos Leading to Identity Blind Spots: The fragmented state of identity and security leads to gaps in visibility and context, making it impossible to enforce security across the entire infrastructure—from cloud to on-premises.
Systems That Don’t Support MFA: Legacy applications, command-line tools (e.g., PsExec), and IT/OT infrastructure typically lack native MFA support—leaving high-risk entry points into your Active Directory.
Service Accounts and Other Non-Human Identities (NHIs): These accounts are difficult to discover, monitor, and protect. Most are overprivileged, unmonitored, and shared across environments.
Ineffective Privileged Access Controls: Traditional PAM is complex, slow to deploy, and easily bypassed. It rarely extends to cloud entitlements or non-human accounts.
Unified Visibility Across the Entire Identity Fabric: Understand who has access to what, why, and how—with real-time risk and contextual insights—across on-prem resources to cloud infrastructure and SaaS apps.
Protection for Both Human and Non-Human Identities: Secure access for every identity—whether it belongs to a service, application, machine or AI agent—enforcing granular, risk-aware access controls and continuous authentication.
Proactive Monitoring and Behavioral Analytics: Baseline activity and quickly flag deviations—even for trusted or internal accounts.
Real-Time Misconfiguration and Threat Detection: Surface vulnerabilities before they’re exploited and trigger intelligent alerts or automated remediations.
Seamless Integration: Plug into your IAM, ITSM, SIEM, cloud, and infrastructure tools without added complexity.
Automation of Workflows and Policy Enforcement: Move from reactive to proactive—and from manual to scalable.
1.
Implement comprehensive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) across cloud, on-prem, and legacy systems
Ask the questions below to evaluate whether a vendor’s MFA is truly adaptive, risk-aware, and capable of protecting the full scope of your environment—including legacy systems, command-line tools, remote infrastructure, and applications that don’t support modern authentication protocols:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Does your solution enable MFA for systems that are more challenging, i.e., command-line tools like PsExec to IT/OT infrastructure and custom apps? |
02 | Does your solution eliminate the need for agents or proxies with real-time or inline enforcement? |
03 | Can your solution provide MFA for all AD authentications, including NTLM, Kerberos, LDAP and LDAPS? |
04 | Does your solution extend Entra ID conditional access to AD-managed resources? |
05 | Does your solution integrate with Okta MFA? |
Most MFA solutions weren’t designed to cover everything—leaving behind a long tail of unprotected systems, legacy protocols, and unmanaged interfaces. From command-line tools like PsExec to IT/OT infrastructure and custom apps, many critical assets simply don’t support traditional MFA. Even where MFA is deployed, implementation is often complex—requiring agents or proxies—and managing multiple MFA tools across on-prem and cloud leads to redundant costs and inconsistent user experience.
What organizations truly need is universal MFA: the ability to extend MFA protection to any resource, without modifying servers or applications, and without being locked into a single MFA provider.
2.
Enforce least privilege access and contain active threats
Use the table below to assess whether vendors offer authentication-level protection across your hybrid environment:
Top questions to ask | |
01 | Does your solution have runtime access protection, offering preemptive, inline security controls at the authentication layer? |
02 | Can your solution prevent lateral movement and ransomware propagation as it’s happening? |
03 | Can your solution prevent PAM bypass by admins that log in directly to resources? |
Internal Active Directory (AD) environments remain one of the most vulnerable and under-protected layers in the enterprise. Traditional network segmentation is costly, slow to deploy, and still lacks the precision to prevent identity-based threats. Once an attacker gains a foothold, there's often no way to stop lateral movement or privilege escalation without shutting down core business systems. Worse yet, most detection tools trigger only after the damage has already been done.
What’s needed is inline enforcement at the point of authentication—deep within the IAM infrastructure, or Active Directory—so access can be blocked or challenged before a session is ever established. That’s where an authentication firewall comes in. An authentication firewall inspects every login attempt and continuously assesses risk—enforcing policy before the session begins.
3.
Protect all privileged users and prevent privileged escalation and abuse
Instead of managing access with rigid vaulting, Privileged Access Security focuses on visibility, just-in-time access, and activity oversight. The following questions help evaluate if vendors go beyond legacy PAM to deliver flexible, risk-aware privileged access controls:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Can your solution discover unknown privileged accounts? |
02 | Can your solution enforce least privilege access by restricting where accounts can be used through virtual fencing? |
03 | How does your solution prevent abuse of privileged accounts without disrupting legitimate workflows? |
Privileged accounts continue to be one of the most abused entry points in breaches and insider threats. Traditionally, privileged access management (PAM) solutions have been slow to deploy, complex to manage, and often fail to deliver meaningful protection. Onboarding can take months—or years—and privileged accounts often remain undiscovered or misclassified. Even when implemented, users and attackers can still bypass PAM controls, leaving critical systems exposed.
What organizations truly need is a faster, more intelligent approach to privileged access—one that reduces overhead, eliminates blind spots, and enforces least privilege dynamically. This is why we’re proposing that your identity security platform should focus on Privileged Access Security (PAS).
4.
Discover, classify, and secure service accounts and other machine or non-human identities
Use the following checklist to ensure the solution secures every NHI across cloud, on-prem, and for all of your identity providers:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Can your solution automatically discover and classify the following types of NHIs or programmable access credentials: • On premises AD service accounts |
02 | Can your solution view every authentication request that goes across Active Directory? |
03 | Does your solution automate protection of machine identities at scale using APIs, smart policy engines, and integrations such as CMDB or ticketing systems? |
04 | Can your solution provide identification and inventory, and maps the source & destination of service accounts? |
05 | Can your solution facilitate the onboarding of service accounts to PAM? |
Non-human identities (NHIs)—like service accounts, scripts, tokens, and automation keys—now outnumber human users in most environments 50:1, and this divide continues to grow. Yet these identities often operate in the shadows. They're difficult to discover, lack clear ownership, and are frequently granted excessive privileges. Even worse, they're regularly repurposed beyond their original intent and rarely deprovisioned, creating a sprawling and vulnerable attack surface.
Securing NHIs requires more than secrets management or vaulting. Organizations need complete visibility, active control, and scalable automation to manage these identities throughout their lifecycle—across both cloud and on-prem environments.
5.
Detect and block credential abuse, stop lateral movement, reduce false positives, and activate real-time response
Ask these questions to validate the vendor’s ability to detect and respond to identity-driven threats in real time:
Top questions to ask | |
01 | Does your solution deliver advanced identity-aware threat detection that inspects every access attempt across on-prem and cloud resources? |
02 | Can your solution go beyond passive detection to actually enable inline, real-time responses to malicious behavior? |
03 | Does your solution stop attackers with step-up authentication, access blocking, or forced re-authentication? And can it do so without halting user productivity? |
04 | If a breach occurs, can your solution contain the attack and ensure it doesn’t spread to additional resources? |
Attackers increasingly target identity as the weakest link—leveraging credential theft, privilege escalation, and lateral movement to bypass traditional defenses. In fact, over 80% of breaches involve stolen or compromised credentials, according to the 2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report. Yet most detection and response tools weren’t built with identity in mind. They either generate noise without context or surface threats too late to act. IBM’s 2024 report shows it takes an average of 204 days to identify and contain a breach, often because tools focus on detection alone, without the means to interrupt an attack in real time. The result: endless alerts, high false positives, and limited ability to stop the breach before damage is done. Microsoft’s Digital Defense Report also notes that identity-based attacks have surged by over 250% year-over-year, underscoring the critical need for identity-first security strategies.
To close these gaps, organizations need an ITDR solution that’s identity-native and proactive—not just reactive. The right ITDR tool can identify threats that target identity infrastructure—lateral movement, privilege escalation, and suspicious access patterns.
6.
Improve identity security posture and proactively discover risks and remediate weaknesses across hybrid environments
Use the checklist below to confirm if the vendor supports continuous identity posture management and compliance alignment with your needs:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Can your solution provide a prioritized inventory of identity weaknesses within the organization? |
02 | Can your solution identify exposures associated with user activity and authentication requests, such as legacy protocols? |
03 | How do you identify service accounts that are dormant or no longer in use? |
04 | Can your platform detect users who are not in Domain Admins or other obvious groups, but still have admin-level permissions (shadow admins)? |
The identity infrastructure is full of hidden exposures—misconfigurations, outdated protocols, excessive privileges, and insecure defaults that silently accumulate across legacy AD, cloud platforms, and SaaS environments. These weak points often go unnoticed until it's too late, leading to account takeovers, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and failed audits. Mapping and remediating these risks at scale is incredibly difficult—especially when teams lack centralized visibility and can’t prove progress to security leaders or compliance auditors.
What organizations need is a proactive, scalable approach to harden their identity posture—one that delivers both continuous protection and measurable results. ISPM helps you assess, improve, and maintain identity hygiene—tracking configuration drift, excessive entitlements, and policy violations.
How fast was time to value?
Were there any hidden costs or integration issues?
How well does the platform scale?
What kind of alerts do they find most useful?
Have they prevented any real-world identity threats or assisted with incident response?
Were you able to leverage the solution to help you obtain a cyber insurance security policy?
Can your platform support compliance requirements like HIPAA, SOC2, ISO 27001, and more?
What reporting and dashboarding features are available?
Is your solution available in SaaS, hybrid, or on-prem deployments?
What SLAs and support options do you offer?
Do you offer services for onboarding, tuning, and ongoing success?
What integrations are native versus custom-built?
What is the estimated cost for a 12-month period including “implied” or non-explicit costs?
Silverfort is the only identity security platform built to secure every dimension of identity—across all environments, users, systems, and identity types.
It replaces patchwork tools with a unified, future-ready solution that empowers security and IAM teams to:
Discover every identity across every environment—from a single platform
Analyze all access activity to uncover risks, exposures, and threats in real time
Enforce security policies inline—across systems that previously couldn’t be protected, including legacy infrastructure, command-line tools, and non-human identities
Whether you're facing identity sprawl, legacy blind spots, or compliance pressures, Silverfort gives you the visibility, control, and enforcement power to stay ahead of threats—without disrupting users or adding operational burden. Learn more about the Silverfort Identity Security Platform here and take a self-guided tour of its core capabilities.


Choosing the right identity security platform is not about adding another point solution. It’s about connecting the dots across your access, identity, and security stack—so your team can make smarter decisions, respond faster, and stay ahead of threats. We hope you find this guide helpful in assessing vendors, cutting through the noise, and finding a platform built for today’s modern identity risks.
Learn more
About Silverfort
Silverfort secures every dimension of identity. We deliver end-to-end identity security that is easy to deploy and won’t disrupt business operations, resulting in better security outcomes with less work. Discover every identity, analyze exposures, and enforce protection inline to stop lateral movement, ransomware, and other identity threats.

Learn more
About Silverfort
Silverfort secures every dimension of identity. We deliver end-to-end identity security that is easy to deploy and won’t disrupt business operations, resulting in better security outcomes with less work. Discover every identity, analyze exposures, and enforce protection inline to stop lateral movement, ransomware, and other identity threats.
1.
Implement comprehensive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) across cloud, on-prem, and legacy systems
Ask the questions below to evaluate whether a vendor’s MFA is truly adaptive, risk-aware, and capable of protecting the full scope of your environment—including legacy systems, command-line tools, remote infrastructure, and applications that don’t support modern authentication protocols:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Does your solution enable MFA for systems that are more challenging, i.e., command-line tools like PsExec to IT/OT infrastructure and custom apps? |
02 | Does your solution eliminate the need for agents or proxies with real-time or inline enforcement? |
03 | Can your solution provide MFA for all AD authentications, including NTLM, Kerberos, LDAP and LDAPS? |
04 | Does your solution extend Entra ID conditional access to AD-managed resources? |
05 | Does your solution integrate with Okta MFA? |
Most MFA solutions weren’t designed to cover everything—leaving behind a long tail of unprotected systems, legacy protocols, and unmanaged interfaces. From command-line tools like PsExec to IT/OT infrastructure and custom apps, many critical assets simply don’t support traditional MFA. Even where MFA is deployed, implementation is often complex—requiring agents or proxies—and managing multiple MFA tools across on-prem and cloud leads to redundant costs and inconsistent user experience.
What organizations truly need is universal MFA: the ability to extend MFA protection to any resource, without modifying servers or applications, and without being locked into a single MFA provider.
2.
Enforce least privilege access and contain active threats
Use the table below to assess whether vendors offer authentication-level protection across your hybrid environment:
Top questions to ask | |
01 | Does your solution have runtime access protection, offering preemptive, inline security controls at the authentication layer? |
02 | Can your solution prevent lateral movement and ransomware propagation as it’s happening? |
03 | Can your solution prevent PAM bypass by admins that log in directly to resources? |
Internal Active Directory (AD) environments remain one of the most vulnerable and under-protected layers in the enterprise. Traditional network segmentation is costly, slow to deploy, and still lacks the precision to prevent identity-based threats. Once an attacker gains a foothold, there's often no way to stop lateral movement or privilege escalation without shutting down core business systems. Worse yet, most detection tools trigger only after the damage has already been done.
What’s needed is inline enforcement at the point of authentication—deep within the IAM infrastructure, or Active Directory—so access can be blocked or challenged before a session is ever established. That’s where an authentication firewall comes in. An authentication firewall inspects every login attempt and continuously assesses risk—enforcing policy before the session begins.
3.
Protect all privileged users and prevent privileged escalation and abuse
Instead of managing access with rigid vaulting, Privileged Access Security focuses on visibility, just-in-time access, and activity oversight. The following questions help evaluate if vendors go beyond legacy PAM to deliver flexible, risk-aware privileged access controls:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Can your solution discover unknown privileged accounts? |
02 | Can your solution enforce least privilege access by restricting where accounts can be used through virtual fencing? |
03 | How does your solution prevent abuse of privileged accounts without disrupting legitimate workflows? |
Privileged accounts continue to be one of the most abused entry points in breaches and insider threats. Traditionally, privileged access management (PAM) solutions have been slow to deploy, complex to manage, and often fail to deliver meaningful protection. Onboarding can take months—or years—and privileged accounts often remain undiscovered or misclassified. Even when implemented, users and attackers can still bypass PAM controls, leaving critical systems exposed.
What organizations truly need is a faster, more intelligent approach to privileged access—one that reduces overhead, eliminates blind spots, and enforces least privilege dynamically. This is why we’re proposing that your identity security platform should focus on Privileged Access Security (PAS).
4.
Discover, classify, and secure service accounts and other machine or non-human identities
Use the following checklist to ensure the solution secures every NHI across cloud, on-prem, and for all of your identity providers:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Can your solution automatically discover and classify the following types of NHIs or programmable access credentials: • On premises AD service accounts |
02 | Can your solution view every authentication request that goes across Active Directory? |
03 | Does your solution automate protection of machine identities at scale using APIs, smart policy engines, and integrations such as CMDB or ticketing systems? |
04 | Can your solution provide identification and inventory, and maps the source & destination of service accounts? |
05 | Can your solution facilitate the onboarding of service accounts to PAM? |
Non-human identities (NHIs)—like service accounts, scripts, tokens, and automation keys—now outnumber human users in most environments 50:1, and this divide continues to grow. Yet these identities often operate in the shadows. They're difficult to discover, lack clear ownership, and are frequently granted excessive privileges. Even worse, they're regularly repurposed beyond their original intent and rarely deprovisioned, creating a sprawling and vulnerable attack surface.
Securing NHIs requires more than secrets management or vaulting. Organizations need complete visibility, active control, and scalable automation to manage these identities throughout their lifecycle—across both cloud and on-prem environments.
5.
Detect and block credential abuse, stop lateral movement, reduce false positives, and activate real-time response
Ask these questions to validate the vendor’s ability to detect and respond to identity-driven threats in real time:
Top questions to ask | |
01 | Does your solution deliver advanced identity-aware threat detection that inspects every access attempt across on-prem and cloud resources? |
02 | Can your solution go beyond passive detection to actually enable inline, real-time responses to malicious behavior? |
03 | Does your solution stop attackers with step-up authentication, access blocking, or forced re-authentication? And can it do so without halting user productivity? |
04 | If a breach occurs, can your solution contain the attack and ensure it doesn’t spread to additional resources? |
Attackers increasingly target identity as the weakest link—leveraging credential theft, privilege escalation, and lateral movement to bypass traditional defenses. In fact, over 80% of breaches involve stolen or compromised credentials, according to the 2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report. Yet most detection and response tools weren’t built with identity in mind. They either generate noise without context or surface threats too late to act. IBM’s 2024 report shows it takes an average of 204 days to identify and contain a breach, often because tools focus on detection alone, without the means to interrupt an attack in real time. The result: endless alerts, high false positives, and limited ability to stop the breach before damage is done. Microsoft’s Digital Defense Report also notes that identity-based attacks have surged by over 250% year-over-year, underscoring the critical need for identity-first security strategies.
To close these gaps, organizations need an ITDR solution that’s identity-native and proactive—not just reactive. The right ITDR tool can identify threats that target identity infrastructure—lateral movement, privilege escalation, and suspicious access patterns.
6.
Improve identity security posture and proactively discover risks and remediate weaknesses across hybrid environments
Use the checklist below to confirm if the vendor supports continuous identity posture management and compliance alignment with your needs:


Top questions to ask | |
01 | Can your solution provide a prioritized inventory of identity weaknesses within the organization? |
02 | Can your solution identify exposures associated with user activity and authentication requests, such as legacy protocols? |
03 | How do you identify service accounts that are dormant or no longer in use? |
04 | Can your platform detect users who are not in Domain Admins or other obvious groups, but still have admin-level permissions (shadow admins)? |
The identity infrastructure is full of hidden exposures—misconfigurations, outdated protocols, excessive privileges, and insecure defaults that silently accumulate across legacy AD, cloud platforms, and SaaS environments. These weak points often go unnoticed until it's too late, leading to account takeovers, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and failed audits. Mapping and remediating these risks at scale is incredibly difficult—especially when teams lack centralized visibility and can’t prove progress to security leaders or compliance auditors.
What organizations need is a proactive, scalable approach to harden their identity posture—one that delivers both continuous protection and measurable results. ISPM helps you assess, improve, and maintain identity hygiene—tracking configuration drift, excessive entitlements, and policy violations.
Unified Visibility Across the Entire Identity Fabric: Understand who has access to what, why, and how—with real-time risk and contextual insights—across on-prem resources to cloud infrastructure and SaaS apps.
Protection for Both Human and Non-Human Identities: Secure access for every identity—whether it belongs to a service, application, machine or AI agent—enforcing granular, risk-aware access controls and continuous authentication.
Proactive Monitoring and Behavioral Analytics: Baseline activity and quickly flag deviations—even for trusted or internal accounts.
Real-Time Misconfiguration and Threat Detection: Surface vulnerabilities before they’re exploited and trigger intelligent alerts or automated remediations.
Seamless Integration: Plug into your IAM, ITSM, SIEM, cloud, and infrastructure tools without added complexity.
Automation of Workflows and Policy Enforcement: Move from reactive to proactive—and from manual to scalable.

How fast was time to value?
Were there any hidden costs or integration issues?
How well does the platform scale?
What kind of alerts do they find most useful?
Have they prevented any real-world identity threats or assisted with incident response?
Were you able to leverage the solution to help you obtain a cyber insurance security policy?
Can your platform support compliance requirements like HIPAA, SOC2, ISO 27001, and more?
What reporting and dashboarding features are available?
Is your solution available in SaaS, hybrid, or on-prem deployments?
What SLAs and support options do you offer?
Do you offer services for onboarding, tuning, and ongoing success?
What integrations are native versus custom-built?
What is the estimated cost for a 12-month period including “implied” or non-explicit costs?
Choosing the right identity security platform is not about adding another point solution. It’s about connecting the dots across your access, identity, and security stack—so your team can make smarter decisions, respond faster, and stay ahead of threats. We hope you find this guide helpful in assessing vendors, cutting through the noise, and finding a platform built for today’s modern identity risks.
To truly reduce risk and strengthen identity defense, organizations need a unified identity security platform—one that brings together complete visibility, real-time threat detection, access insights, posture management, and policy enforcement across all identities, human and non-human, cloud and on-prem. A holistic approach to identity security enables security and identity teams to make risk-aware, context-driven security decisions in real-time to boost security and improve compliance performance overall.
Lack of Visibility Across IAM Infrastructure and Resources: Organizations often lack a unified view into identities, their privileges, entitlements, and access activity. This allows misconfigurations, vulnerable protocols, legacy trust relationships, and unmanaged accounts to frequently go undetected.
Silos Leading to Identity Blind Spots: The fragmented state of identity and security leads to gaps in visibility and context, making it impossible to enforce security across the entire infrastructure—from cloud to on-premises.
Systems That Don’t Support MFA: Legacy applications, command-line tools (e.g., PsExec), and IT/OT infrastructure typically lack native MFA support—leaving high-risk entry points into your Active Directory.
Service Accounts and Other Non-Human Identities (NHIs): These accounts are difficult to discover, monitor, and protect. Most are overprivileged, unmonitored, and shared across environments.
Ineffective Privileged Access Controls: Traditional PAM is complex, slow to deploy, and easily bypassed. It rarely extends to cloud entitlements or non-human accounts.


Most organizations operate with a hybrid, fragmented IAM infrastructure—spanning Active Directory, cloud identity providers, SaaS, legacy systems, and distributed environments. This complexity makes it nearly impossible to enforce consistent policies, maintain visibility, or respond to risk in real time. Identity security controls end up siloed, reactive, and riddled with blind spots.
Traditional IAM platforms:
Legacy IAM tools like identity governance and administration (IGA) and privileged access management (PAM) were built for structured, static environments—not the modern identity landscape. While they handle provisioning and governance, they often lack real-time behavioral insight, take years to implement, and require heavy customization. Many never deliver the time-to-value or ROI organizations expect.
Security-first platforms:
Those solutions that originate from endpoint, network, or cloud protection frameworks—even those that have added identity signal enrichment—still tend to treat identity as one data point among many, not as the central control plane. While these tools can detect behavioral anomalies and offer some enforcement, they often lack deep visibility into identity entitlements, access paths, and privilege misuse. As a result, they miss the full context of who accessed what, why, and how—a critical blind spot in identity-driven attacks.
Point solutions:
Targeting individual identity challenges—like access reviews, CIEM, or NHI monitoring—often adds operational overhead. Each brings its own dashboard, logic, and data model, increasing complexity instead of reducing it.
With hundreds of identity security solutions on the market—each claiming to solve a piece of the puzzle—it’s critical to know what capabilities truly matter. Whether you're evaluating platforms for MFA, identity threat detection and response (ITDR), privileged access, identity security posture management (ISPM), or non-human identity (NHI) protection, understanding what to look for in each area will help you identify the product that meets your organization’s unique needs.
This RFP checklist is designed to help you evaluate vendors across six key product areas and ask the right questions to find a comprehensive, best-of-breed solution that fits your environment—and future-proofs your security.
Checklist

Silverfort is the only identity security platform built to secure every dimension of identity—across all environments, users, systems, and identity types.
It replaces patchwork tools with a unified, future-ready solution that empowers security and IAM teams to:
Discover every identity across every environment—from a single platform
Analyze all access activity to uncover risks, exposures, and threats in real time
Enforce security policies inline—across systems that previously couldn’t be protected, including legacy infrastructure, command-line tools, and non-human identities
Whether you're facing identity sprawl, legacy blind spots, or compliance pressures, Silverfort gives you the visibility, control, and enforcement power to stay ahead of threats—without disrupting users or adding operational burden. Learn more about the Silverfort Identity Security Platform here and take a self-guided tour of its core capabilities.

